Modified Cam Clay Model Parameters in ABAQUS from Triaxial Tests

›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 651-657.

Previous Articles Next Articles

Modified Cam Clay Model Parameters in ABAQUS from Triaxial Tests

LV Yang

(The Third Railway Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Tianjin 300251)

Received:2016-07-12 Revised:2016-07-26 Online:2016-12-20 Published:2016-12-22

Abstract

Abstract: Numerical analysis has more and more applications in the practical geotechnical engineering projects and the Modified Cam Clay Model is a popular constitutive model in these analyses. A twodimensional axisymmetric model was established in commercial finite element software ABAQUS with both soilwater coupling effective stress and automatic time spacing approaches. The model parameters in the ABAQUS were validated in the triaxial tests on normally consolidated and overconsolidated soil samples under consolidated drained and undrained conditions. The parametric studies can be performed in the ABAQUS by using the validated parameters.

Key words: ABAQUS, Modified Cam Clay Model, Triaxial Tests, Parametric Study

LV Yang. Modified Cam Clay Model Parameters in ABAQUS from Triaxial Tests[J]. , 2016, 30(6): 651-657.

[1]	ZHU Sixiang, WEI Xiaojing. The Application of ABAQUS in an Existing Structure Tilting Mitigation Project [J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2025, 39(2): 188-191.
[2]	LIANG Chen, HUANG Yiqin, SHEN Ziyu. Tunneling Rate of EPBS in Hard-Soft Heterogeneous Ground [J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2023, 37(5): 712-714.
[3]	QIN Yawei, JU Wanglai, LEI Yongjin, . Numerical Analysis of Displacement Characteristics of Steel Sheet Pile Cofferdam under Dynamic Load [J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2023, 37(4): 650-654.
[4]	WU Guoying, PAN Shenggui, ZHENG Weijun. Undrained Shear strength Parameters for Residual Granitic Soil Samples Under Different Test Conditions [J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2022, 36(6): 972-976.
[5]	HUANG Shaoran, MU Chunmei, . Research Progress of a New Photogrammetry Method in Triaxial Tests [J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2022, 36(4): 649-652.
[6]	ZHAO Kelie, ZHENG Hongjian, LI Jian, YANG Zhiyong. Development and Application of a Combined Testing Device for SmallStrain Parameters of Soil [J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2021, 35(2): 238-242.
[7]	LIU Houcheng, GUO Qijun. Deformation Monitoring and Numerical Analysis of Metro Deep Excavation Using ABAQUS [J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2021, 35(1): 72-75.
[8]	WANG Chunguang, ZHU Shouzeng, LIU Yukun, PANG Banghui, HUI Yanglei. Optimization of Anchored Frame Beams Using Two-Parameter Method [J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2020, 34(2): 152-158.
[9]	REN Jianxing. Discrete Element Analysis of Penetration and Expansion During Flat Dilatometer Testing#br# [J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2020, 34(2): 194-199.
[10]	QIU Zhihua, , DAI Zihang, XU Xiang, ZHAO Wuyang, CHEN Baolin, . Field Tests and Numerical Analysis of Anti-Buoyancy Anchors [J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2019, 33(6): 713-716.
[11]	WENG Yiling1, YIN Juan1, CHEN Weijun1, YU Kefu2, WANG Xinzhi3. Influencing Factors for Particle Breakage of the Calcareous Sand under Triaxial Tests [J]. , 2019, 33(3): 295-298.
[12]	LI Shu1, FENG Hongchao1， ZHANG Lizhan2. Considerations on the Laboratory Testing Standards-Using Triaxial Shear Test and One-Dimensional Consolidation Test at High Pressure [J]. , 2019, 33(3): 320-325.
[13]	CAI Wulin. Numerical Analysis of the Effect of a Pipe Jacking Closely Above an Active Subway Tunnel [J]. , 2018, 32(1): 42-45.
[14]	LIN Kongbin1,2,3， KE Guogui4. Size Effect on the Shear Strength of Granitic Residual Soils [J]. , 2017, 31(4): 521-525.
[15]	QIAN Wei1, ZHANG Zohui2,3. Mohr-Coulomb Strength Parameter Tests in Triaxial Shearing Testing Device [J]. , 2017, 31(2): 231-232.

Modified Cam Clay Model Parameters in ABAQUS from Triaxial Tests

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments