›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 157-160.

• 工程实录 • 上一篇    下一篇

武汉某基坑支护工程设计方案比较分析

严稳平   

  1. (中冶集团武汉勘察研究院有限公司,武汉 430080)
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-26 修回日期:2016-10-10 出版日期:2017-04-20 发布日期:2017-05-04
  • 作者简介:严稳平(1977-),男,高级工程师,一级建造师,研究方向为岩土工程。

Supporting Methods Comparison for a Deep Excavation Project in Wuhan

YAN Wenping   

  1. (Wuhan SurveyingGeotechnical Research Institute Co. Ltd., MCCC, Wuhan, 430080)
  • Received:2016-09-26 Revised:2016-10-10 Online:2017-04-20 Published:2017-05-04

摘要: 基坑支护方案应安全适用、保护环境、技术先进、经济合理。结合基坑的周边环境、地质和水文条件、基坑开挖深度等条件对排桩+可回收预应力锚索方案及排桩+钢筋混凝土支撑方案进行对比分析。通过对比发现,于锚索施工后基坑内部空间开阔,便于土方开挖及地下结构施工,排桩+可回收预应力锚索方案在造价和工期方面均优于钢筋混凝土支撑方案。

关键词: 基坑, 可回收预应力锚索, 内支撑

Abstract: The general guide lines for the deep excavation supporting project design should be safe, serve for the purposes, environmental friendly, apply the appropriate construction method, and more importantly, be cost effective. Based on the adjacent constraint and site geotechnical and hydrological conditions, this paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the three different excavation supporting methods, namely, secant piles; reuseable prestressed ground anchor with secant pile; and reinforced concrete internal support. It is concluded that the prestressed ground anchor with secant pile method is better over other two methods since it creates larger construction space so that the construction schedule could be met and it is also more cost effective than other methods.

Key words: Deep Excavations, Reuseable Prestressed Ground Anchors, Internal Support