土工基础 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 727-731.

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

泥岩拌和水泥改良土填筑机场道基褥垫层工程特性试验研究

丁 维1,陈 丹1,曾维佳2,封志军3,郑高翔4,赵尚毅4,汪加波1   

  1. (1.中铁五局集团成都工程有限责任公司,成都 610000;2.建研院检测中心有限公司,北京 101200;
    3.中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,成都 500643:4.重庆工程学院,重庆 400056)
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-11 修回日期:2024-07-15 出版日期:2026-08-30 发布日期:2026-08-26
  • 作者简介:丁维(1987-),男,高级工程师,研究方向为岩土工程稳定性。
  • 基金资助:
    重庆工程学院科研基金资助项目(2023gcky01),重庆市教委科学技术研究项目(KJZD-K202301902)

Experimental Study on Engineering Characteristics of Improved Mudstone Soil Mixed with Cement

DING Wei1, CHEN Dan1, ZENG Weijia2, FENG Zhijun3, Zheng Gaoxiang4, ZHAO Shangyi4, WANG Jiabo1   

  1. (1.China Railway No. 5 Engineering Group Chengdu Engineering Co. Ltd., Chengdu 610000;
    2.Building Research Institute Testing Center Co. Ltd., Beijing 101200;
    3.China Railway Second Institute Engineering Group Co. Ltd., Chengdu 500643;
    4.Chongqing Institute of Technology, Chongqing 400056)
  • Received:2024-06-11 Revised:2024-07-15 Online:2026-08-30 Published:2026-08-26

摘要: 我国西南地区启动了众多机场新建和改扩建项目,川渝地区的红层区域成为了这些工程项目的集中地,不可避免的需要处理红层泥岩问题。机场道面地基必须具有足够的承载能力,道基填料的强度、承载比、反应模量、压实度等力学特性需满足相关设计规范的要求。在实际工程中,现场填料往往不满足上述指标要求,能否将现场泥岩改良后作为场道道基是一个值得研究的课题。依托乐山机场,开展了现场试验段试验,包括最佳水泥配合比、CBR、道基反应模量、有机质含量等参数的测试。试验结果表明,泥岩拌和一定比例的水泥后,其工程特性得到明显改善,综合考虑技术经济等因素,提出了泥岩拌和水泥改良土用于机场非飞行区道槽褥垫层填筑的技术指标,即水泥掺量≥2%、颗粒级配良好、最大粒径不超过6 cm、拌和均匀、碾压8遍,压实度≥98%,CBR值≥8%,反应模量≥60 MN·m-3。


关键词: 泥岩, 水泥改良, 道基技术指标, CBR试验, 机场褥垫层填筑

Abstract: Since the early 2 000 s, numerous new airport construction and expansion projects have been initiated across Southwest China, with the red-bed strata of the Sichuan-Chongqing region becoming a focal area for such developments. These projects inevitably encounter engineering challenges associated with red-bed mudstone, particularly in zones requiring deep embankment fills to form runway and taxiway subgrades. Because airport pavement foundations must provide adequate bearing capacity, the mechanical properties of subgrade fill—such as strength, California bearing ratio (CBR), resilient modulus, and degree of compaction—must satisfy stringent design specifications. Consequently, the selection of fill materials is highly restrictive, typically requiring Class A fill. However, in many projects, on-site materials fail to meet these criteria. For example, at Leshan Airport, high-quality granular fill is scarce, and importing suitable material would significantly increase construction costs. Meanwhile, large quantities of mudstone are excavated on site, presenting an opportunity for in-situ utilization. Whether this mudstone can be improved for use as subgrade fill is therefore a question of practical significance. To address this issue, a full-scale trial embankment was constructed at Leshan Airport. Tests were conducted to determine the optimal cement content, CBR, subgrade reaction modulus, organic matter content, and other relevant parameters. The results show that mixing mudstone with an appropriate proportion of cement markedly improves its engineering properties. Considering both technical performance and economic feasibility, technical specifications are proposed for using cement-stabilized mudstone as fill for non-airfield pavement subgrade cushion layers. The recommended criteria include: cement content ≥2%, well-graded particle size distribution, maximum particle size ≤6 cm, uniform mixing, eight passes of compaction, degree of compaction ≥98%, CBR≥8%, and subgrade reaction modulus ≥60 MN/m3.

Key words: Mudstone, Cement Improvement, Road Base Technical Specifications, CBR Test, Airport Bedding

中图分类号: